Logical Track it Us[!]

or Witt gen Stein ...
or stone is half full?
or cast empty.*

* spoiler alert! REALLY, be sure to watch Stone is half full first, as later work has different perspective than TLP.

Stone is have full: Preface to TLP
Perspective: The Plausibility of Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy.
than Aphorisms
TLP the work.
Poetic License ? K? H?(fp?)

Breaking Raven Systems

(Breaking* on Ronan Farrow Daily)
Rolling Stone Retraction or clarification.
(FP1)(Roger Fractal Dilay[!])


~ ~ ~
 ~ ~
  ~


[The Cycle: the three-edged sword?  v. the six faced edge? Jared Bernstein.]


* Rolling Stone

Reader Supported News

from VICE (X),
VOX,
Bloomberg,

RSN, Rolling Stone, RSN,
Esquire

Scroll over Re:view.

12-23-14
Krugman NYT
Matt Taibbi Rolling Stone
Greenwald/Maass The Intercept
Kevin Lincoln VICE News
Marc Ashe Reader Supported News
Patricia Williams The Guardian UK
John Cassidy The New Yorker

Let those without irony

read without whining.

Let those without hyperbole...

Tapper Guiliani

This childishness seems the inverse of logic.
Let those without sin cast the first stone?
How many points are in this bag of stones.

Assuming a stone is for throwing, and there is an unnamed target, it is the who and the order that might be significant.
without /first
10/10/16

Pardon my lack of follow-up.

Obtuseness?

Robert Reich asks why are Democrats voting for Reaganomics?
Paul Craig Roberts suggests another spin on Reaganomics.
Is it the obtuseness of stagflation/inflation?
Is that like growing the pie, while each piece gets smaller?
No, it is like the pie not growing while costs do, and jobs go to pieces. Whew, I think I cut that close to home. But I do think that several of their points do intersect (actually lines do, but at points) but there could be another angle or perspective needed in the back and forth. Enough ge oh me trick ally pointed puns. It may take a third econonomic perspective or formulae to alter the give and take. At least it is not just about supply and demand, but employment and progress. But for whom?
[I did not mean to kill two birds with one stone, but yes I am often obtuse or have a cute angle on things. I may often have too big a picture(stone) or skip from one to another perspective(bird). But this toss is back to the concept of not all things being equal. Not just taxes, but debt and spending, in regards to alternate pies, perspectives or form you lie.]
[Potential Star Chamber? The other four points.]
[Breaking, a cuteness.]

Two Birds

Under No Illusions...
or dot com or one stone.
There is no rejoicing in the FOX and the Badger** events, or Beck's* and Walker's travails.

* see FOX under "up"
**recall/recounts
[nor one flock]

[PAST THREE POSTS: Postal and back again.]

[UPDATES]
Friday April 08, 2011
[The Test of Post Links or Leaps.(See under stone above)]
[To parse later: "the world's best hope"..."idealists and pragmatists"..."that the world would improve"..."dissipated in the Romantic"..."secular missionaries"..."the imperial age"..."continued to enlarge". "These then are the antecedents." "Does the U.S. indeed occupy..." "Is it merely our superior military..."

It is unfortunate that the political discourse these days dictates that you can't love your country if you don't believe in its exceptionalism. Such oversimplification is one of the reasons why national campaigns focus on symbolic language instead of substantive problems and the alternative plans candidates propose to resolve them sensibly.

Exceptionalism seems to mean, "We lead, others follow." Instead, let's try: In spite of our commanding power, we lead judiciously by consulting with allies and seeking widely agreed-upon solutions to international crises. Can't America be unique among nations without dictating? That seems to be the true articulation of President Obama’s view of the contested term

speaking of one beak]
[Drawing the line.]

True Ledership

No, that is not Leadership, it is the pinnacle of the process.

[9-29-11 Under review re: lede*** (does not require a follow-up as the link morphed) But I am trying to find the lost link This one.]

A lede*** requires a follow-up. Like the constitution has its first three articles or branches of the government, the tetrahedron has its base as a triangle and another dimension, and what is the point? That is political. There are the Legislative, Executive and the Judiciary braches. But what is the point? Or rather the base*?

We the people...

of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

* Oh the humanity
[Another problem? Or anti-pragmatics? The narrative will evolve and involve: Highways or the Low(or No) way. Not to hop the Scotch or translations but...Lock Low Mond?]
["In a perfect world the president ought to wish"...[*]NOT! link(for quote) to be** provided later The Place for Politics.]

** Note: not that I have viewed all the links, but many provide the contrast between progress and anything butT-headism.
[Speaking of Process under-LedeRship.]

*** ledership is not always easy to link: Gunn takes Shot at Alley's Weight.

[Speaking Bane Or Analogies: if spending is the coke, then the debt that Reagan and Bush racked up are illegal debts that need not be paid. Explain that to the defense, healthecare and financial industries(the wealthy) that they need not be paid. In fact, that may actually help regarding the ledership and 2012, if the people realize who the dealers of debt are.]

Delta Dawn


Whose your Daddy?

Rolling Stone. The T[?] (Or the t[!])

[Sum of the some game: War is hard work and progress even more tricky, but a few want(scratch that need) a quick fix.]

[*] [9-21-11 Update: It is regretable that I cannot find the MSNBC segment for the quote above, but as for follow up, pandemonium may be embedded somewhere(not).]

Waiting for [Calm Cast]

[...]
In [brackets],
this is a big deal.

By this I mean, yes I am actually waiting for Comcast to check on the strength of my signals. Meanwhile, the President has taken some guff for his ESPN time, [yet] he did kill two birds with one stone by making a plea for aid to the triple disaster in Japan. And by "big deal", I mean the UN vote not getting one veto of its resolution for use of "all necessary measures" to protect civilians in Libya. This may be the un- mess age. It may be about the choices we make.

Now...before I embolden the most need to read or view, I will add that I did not* have all these links when I hit the keyboard this morning. My point is that waiting for the right time to...

[QED/FOOTNOTE: A subsidiary point is that no matter the actions even the president takes, we just can't win without the butterfly(see NOT) of politics. Even this QED was not about finetuning the general idea, until it flapped its wings and did more than footnote. It was actually about the idea that I only had a footnote and the above needed no more.]

* double negative? On point of having message before hand(or (maybe not).

[UPDATE: Comcast** is yet to arrive, [and NewsNation has yet to have clip available] but the President just made an announcement. He is bridging the signals gap and being a uniter not burning Bush.]

** yet this is a convenient(or inconvenient) thread (or what)

We Need Ed

Happy April Fools!
I am killing two birds with one stone and irony of political correctness, let Hawks and Doves fly. And I won't even get into the Missio'gander*, but there I go again.
We do need an education but I am really paying tribute to Ed Schultz. Apparently it is two years ago today that he got his/our show.

* Ok a crack at the goose and the Cheeseheads and staying the course.

But for Obama.

The "One"? No Moss.(Rolling Stone)
Yes Bill Clinton should be listened to.
I am not sure he is not.
I am also not sure I should apologize for a pun. (No Mas?) But not only can one word make a difference, but who uses it, and how? Maybe even the "T" Party might have meaning.
(Tetrahedron of Will.)[The Car or Ditch metaphor: We could have used a TOW truck rather than the gear shift, and we are not off the hook. But I better drop the transmission.]
[Speaking of links or one.]
[The key to my thread is the one, and what next?]

Why does Popper pop up?

The Popper[!]

the problem [!]
Patheos
Evolution News
Sword in the Stone

https://platofootnote.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/mike-dont-listen-to-bill-nye-about-philosophy/

The one thing?

[Right Columns Being Updated]

Well...
it was a chart that demonstrates the effects on GNP for various stimulative choices.

Translation:
Tax Cuts Bad
Federal Spending Good.
This of course is overly simplified, and relative to the position on the (Laffer) bell curve for tax rates.
Permanent tax cuts do not get even get half their money's worth of stimulative effect, while all categories under federal spending get well more than their buck's bang.

Speaking of "Killing two birds with one stone"...
Rachel Maddow [*] addresses the issue of Wisconsin and why Democrats exist(economic populism).
(Wall Street Journal/NBC Poll)

[Navigation aid: see bold link(s)]
[UPDATE 1-22-11 Keith and Rachel, D-part meant of Corrections and Stephanie Miller]
[Bottom Line? Democrats can stand strong and the American people will support them, and standing with the unions of Wisconsin and collective bargaining will be what the average American supports, the lopsided money and media to the contrary.]
[Potential follow-up: No to Violence, No to Prank News: But seriously.]
[*] my apologies the bold Rachel Maddow link has been corrected
[further Huckabee, Ed Schultz, Norman Goldman**, and Reverse Re-Verses.]
** must add show link for Norman

The Daily Counter Balance

From The Dylan Ratigan Show:

The Daily Rant**: Today*

Speaking of headings or ledes or 4 ehs [!]

* to be linked here(Goodfriend Tribute to Snowe^)

[Speaking of preemptive embedding, Hardball on Romney speaking in pros, "looking for a KO"^?

Churning media or fulfilling the table, Killing Organizing, or Freedom of Foundation? Let alone "life among the cannibals.^" Not to mention AP-Paul-ING^ "Politics Nation". Do we want an Obama Nation or a Bane Nor Nation?*** Not to Pun on Lioness Pauling up Watson Creek.]

** actually this was on a panel (note anachronism of rant and panel)

*** Susan Del Percio^: Interesting Republican Spokes Person(2:42) in her opening talking points or not needing to defend Ryan but whine about the panel being 4 to 1 against her, before attacking the Senate or...

[3-21-12 ^ late links^^ added: Ryan Plan 2013]

^^ Like a Rolling Stone / Wired (Dylan not Belushi)

[The Glorious Revolution is embedded in the academics of "/","not""^^". Republicans want to revisit the mid-17th Century. See ^^ cycle. Sometimes to tergiversate is better than too sate-yore-deceive. (pun on give/take/receive) (Slash Not what you can do...)(If I may quibble withRobert Reich, and Noam Chomsky, I will have to link later^^^, but the former is related byword play to the latter by George. Society plays a part in defining words, so I guess I can't blame Chomsky for using words that we want to change. This relates to the evolution of the wordholocaust and the war on evolution. It relates to groups claiming words while we also want to define them under the flag of progress. Is abortion genocide? Is war murder? The law decides, while some forsake it, and the politics that decide it.)]

^^^ I must find a Chomsky use of the word murder in the context of war. (The connectingtissueis the use of "social Darwinism" in a way that is contrary to the survival of the fittest, that nails trickle-down to the cross. )

[update: Rober Reich ponders run ]

[on balance and more.]

Note that not only do Democrats spend less they generally contribute less to the national debt, at least since the late 70's. OK, so there are only two Democrats before Obama, but look what happened to Carter for being conservative, and at least in Clinton's case he bent the curve in two terms.

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

Now this is the ticket.

Or rather perspective on having a perspective.

1. Professor Ponzi, or thinking about the methodology, the sociology and the economics of economics

2. Sylvia Nasar on The Story of Economic Genius: Great Thinkers in History

New Page: Institute for New Economic Thinking

Also: Progressive Media

Also Updates: Gingrich/Romney on Pop e Culture.*

Such** a deal?

*the links are still evolving, I saw an impressive Romney speech***, but only in the light of Gingrich and Santorum.

** Thom Hartmann roots out biology and an abstraction as corner stone to society, before guestflees. (and that is a note on the light R side)

[BTW: these are living asterisks in their anachronism C*** BTW2.0 He opens with a spin on the joke on Bush. GW gave us progressives. To paraphrase: Obama community organized CPAC.]

*** also C***under-BTW: Pop Culture & yogurt or Yo!Gurt

under **see-not necessarily a huff

[On the Economy, and mythbusters?]

[2-23-12 The Dickens, you say? Label and Image added.]

Post-Posted

It is morning, Monday(~) and I have not found the Jared Bernstein reference on The Cycle.




INSERTS
M: Go Birds! ,  M: AC/DC ,
Jared Bernstein , r: Breaking Raven Systems 


Review of Footnotes Pages [!]*
*irony of italics (not Friday's)
Monday 12-1-14 The Un-Revolved(~) Thread , AsIMovian Principles.
Tuesday 12-2-14 War on Hillary[!]
Wednesday 12-3-14 Hump Day? , WOW 
Thursday 12-4-14 , WOW II (or 2) AC/DC
Friday 12-4-14 TGIF , Breaking Raven Systems
Thank Who for Transparency**?
Monday Morning Post Dated's: AC/DC , Go Birds!

** not exactly (FP1)
(~)ICBM : original M&M of Saturday/Sunday transposed.
Not to the point of the I Can't Breath Message, but family, friends, shopping and football (American traditions all)occupied my weekend. 
But the M-bedded point is the FYI of WTF or What the Ferguson of Filter your Intel(FP2).
There are two occasions that bridge this Reid: The pending release of a torture report and the failure to rescue a hostage. The Attorney General will be also looking into the use of special prosecutors, while the Rolling*** Stone has mossed an issue.

***(FP3)






To Gruber 12-9-14 NOW perfect pair?  The Gump for the Gumbo!

Revolutionary Hospitals (and Back Again)

Recently a health reform critic(kindly put) claimed that the founding fathers had hospitals and did not mention them in the constitution(awkwardly put), but I cannot adequately paraphrase the rhetoric. But I did wonder at the time if it was accurate. Yesterday NPI, has a different angle on health care reform and technical advances and the baby boom face of more than half of recipients of health care. But an auxiliary question came to mind. When did health care become for profit? But the real question is when did health insurance become for profit? My problem is that there is always a deeper question. Our problem is that too many have the wrong answers*.

Some have such a weak definition of capitalism that it is the nature of economics since the public market. Others don't even realize what the "invisible hand" means? I have not fully read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, but at least I know he waved it. But I forgot who recently said, it is called the "Invisible Hand" because it is not there ***. While other's still... [trailing off] I might have been heading to a more substantial answer, but my point is that some people get caught up in the debate between dirty words and the only word. Too many are taking sides, especially when it comes to the word "progressive" by playing on fears and taking change for granted, and passing the buck, but not the money**.

In memoriam.

* and without picking sides I would add: too many feel they have the only answer. At least when it comes to history and what we are based on, with intentions to move forward.

** ironically these last two links have a good point in common(well not exactly): but in regards to the baseline, the blogger admits to some essentials or entitlements if you will, at least outside their argument for the need for profit, while Milton Friedman (a Libertarian) suggests a negative income tax to balance the social responsibility of companies to make profits. And entitlements are the real subject for the operating table, but so might be the flat tax and overall safety net reform. Actually speaking of dirty words, reform is not the word, adjustments are all that are needed to . Not that major adjustments might need to be considered in regard to globalization and world finance and diplomacy, which really scares the one word people, not to mention communities. It is not about the finger in the dike or the egg on the wall or the face of humpty dumpty, it is about the hands on the foundation of civilization.

*** maybe him but not here

Other links, invisible hand, or the pointing finger
[Sorry to not point a finer finger, but it is all about the revolving perspectives and finding balance without starting from scratch.]

P.S. I did not read these but did run across them prior this blog, let alone realize at the time I would be back. They could be the concrete mixer, mortar or cobble stone of my thinking.

Get Out!

THE VOTE!

Re:Sabbatical(A Compendium)
[Inserted now.] [Updated/edited 11-2-10]
[But for Comedy Central (RSN)]
[Not Fully Red? ]
[Meanwhile a real page turner.]
[Added 11-2-10 Obama(No Moss)! See Rolling Stone(RSN)above(page turner)
also Gawker Controversy]

[Final comment: TwoRead. But for TARP; world recession. But for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; 8-1/2 million jobs. But for Reid and Obama! Oh, and Republicans.
To wit: TARP(bailout) and ARRA(stimulus) are not the same or even the same administration.
Neither is the recession end, job recovery.]

The Pacific?

Not
Exactly *
...
But I did pick 'm up.

* who knows

Tic-TOC:
A,
B,
C- D thru H.

(oops!) there he goes again...**

**that darn anomaly
(Not to kill two birds with one stone, but I think I have explained the anomaly, but it may take some time to work out. Not to pun on the tic-TOC, but I don't know how long certain hyperlinks will be valid either. It originally pertained to the TOC (C-*), but as my embedding reached some limit, I pushed the rest onto the Footnotes under PAGES.)

BTW: the purpose of the A-H (ha!) was to list the current BS(blog search) of "The Alantic" Label as it appears before I change anything.

Bush Signs

Voting Rights Act Extension

Signing statements aside, a Robert F. Kennedy Jr. piece means what difference does it make. Link to be provided later, but there was a notorius Rolling Stone article about stolen elections.

More Breaking Filters

The WTO may be a good failure.
US Accused of "Stone-Walling" as World Trade Talks Collapse

The ABA may force change.
American Bar Association Objects to Bush's "Signing Statements"

But the old guard will try to stay the course, speaking of Nixon.
Aziz Huq | Wiretapping Unbound

These are what I have referred to as QCON, Quick Comment On News.
There I go again.